Summary of Nutritional Aspects:

The following is written by the developer of the mineral formulation used in this protocol we talk about on this website, himself a pancreatic cancer survivor, and Nutritional Biochemist:

“Cancer is probably the most controversial issue today, viewpoints ranging from the most complex to most basic manner in which it manifests itself to existence. Some declare that there are mystical and magical abilities, causing surges of money to investigate its complexities, as they attack the symptoms it provides us to chase. My own opinion is reflective of the more simplistic “action causing reaction” principles. My theories are based on the notion that chemistry is the explanation of electronic “attraction–repulsive” activities causing new attractions and repulsions in a domino block manner. From there, if we analyze the mechanics of the basic foundation blocks of chemistry, we will be able to concentrate on researching the initiative aspects of cancer rather than the symptomatic consequences. These cells have no brain of their own and no hidden tools. Current research simply focuses on symptoms rather than “cause and effect” initiation at the front of the domino effect.

My report reflects a portion of the mechanisms I believe are important in achieving improved health and resistance to cancer as we know it. I firmly believe that cancer is the body’s response to a nutritional deficiency in the nervous system rather than a disease, virus or bacteria from external sources. I also do not believe that cancer spreads by any contamination and that there are no such “seeds”. Instead, I believe that the progressive nutritional deficiency causes increased nerve degeneration and effectively reduces the health of relative cells, similar to a branch dying on a tree. Similarly, we cut away the symptomatic evidence instead of correcting the nutritional environment. By restoring the nutritional environment, the cells regain their health and the cancer cells can no longer survive in the restored environment and therefore die off.

Influential factors relative to cancer and its initiation include: genetics, diet, lifestyle, emotions and the environment. The increased concern over the rising incidences of cancer reflects the increase of external influences, resolutions are hindered partly because technology does not address or properly diagnose the patient, more conditions are diagnosed as cancer when they truly are not, while elements that influence cancer initiation or support are increasing as a result of prepared and preserved foods, poor diet and exercise habits, increase stress and poor attitudes, the hypothesized elements are not all conclusive at this time.

In 1900, 3% of all deaths were attributed to cancer, compared to 25% today. The National Cancer Institute (NCI), states that there has been a 28% rise from 1950 – 1988. Although the ability to diagnose in 1900 was less accurate than today, the range clearly indicates that lifestyle changes have influenced the rate of cancer. Further, there are many cases where deaths are not investigated, where cancer may not have been uncovered, including the report stating autopsies of men in their 50’s who died in sudden deaths, such as car accidents, heart attacks, or other non-cancer related event, it was found that 15% of those autopsied did have cancerous cell in their prostate, 40% in those in their 70’s, and 50% of those in their 80’s.

My personal concern with chemically induced tumors or implanted tumors used in research is that these experimental tumors represent an invasive element to an otherwise normal healthy body, therefore, the nutritional deficiency along with other environmental and atmospheric factors do not exist in the experiment, therefore the results to not properly reflect a valid cancerous environment. I believe this situation reflects why there are many cases where experimental testing reveals positive results, only to fail in humans. I believe the current social belief that the primary reason for the failures is primarily due to species differentiation. Instead, I believe the factors lie within the causative environment. The experimental environment is man-made and lacks the important components, the designer of the experiment has not fully defined the problem for the hypothesis, therefore, has not derived an accurate thesis to resolve that problem.

Chromium has shown to help restore normal thyroid function, found mostly in the outer portion of grain. Because chromium is lost during the refining process of grain products, the US population is a chromium deficient nation due to over indulgence in these refined grain products. Excessive iron intake, red meat or non-supplementary, deplete Chromium levels through urine.

Zinc supports many immune system functions, with a close relationship with copper, essential to proper function of immune cell types, including antibody-forming cells, T-helper cells, macrophages, and similar.

A toxic concern of vitamins is a controversy, as a major study compared deaths from pharmaceutical drugs verses vitamins over an 8-year period, starting in 1983 ending in 1990. The results showed 2,556 deaths linked to pharmaceutical drugs were as the results of high dosages of vitamins showed “0” deaths.(1) I personally believed that there were some deaths due to allergic reactions or something questionable, however, it till is a remarkable comparison, which I believe deserves better attention. My focus at this time is on the relationships between calcium and vitamins A, D, and E. It is best to describe them individually, which will show the relationships upon their description. From there, I will summarize the relationships and provide a sense of teamwork within their scope.”

For more information, contact us by telephone if you have any questions. If you are calling outside the United States, click here to find the country code information.

If you are leaving a message for the first time, make sure to mention what country you are calling from and your day and evening contact numbers so we can call you back.